§ 40 — Use Cases
Use Cases
Pattern-level analyses of what works and what fails when supply-chain AI is applied to specific functions and techniques (demand forecasting, inventory optimization, procurement automation, warehouse computer vision), synthesized from the Post-Mortems and corroborated by cited external research (e.g., MIT CTL, SupplyChainBrain, peer-reviewed studies) rather than recycled unsourced industry statistics. Every claim carries a named source and date. Distinct from Post-Mortems (single-deployment accounts) and Readiness (task checklists): this section answers whether a category of AI application actually delivers, and under what conditions it fails, at a pattern level.
Failure pattern: validation gap
Source: Nature Scientific Reports (October 2025)
Source: Global Finance Magazine, Veriv Africa
Failure pattern: overestimated savings scope
Source: MarketIntelo Airline Disruption Management AI Market Research Report 2034, Jun 2026
Failure pattern: cascade prediction gap
Source: ClimateAi, ORMS Today, Everstream Analytics
Source: Forbes (June 2026)
Failure pattern: Overclaiming AI readiness for new-build supply chain
Source: U.S. Department of Energy (2024) – Artificial intelligence is helping optimize nuclear reactor operations
Failure pattern: tier-1-only-visibility
Source: Brookings March 2025, Logistics Viewpoints April 2026
Failure pattern: batch reforecasting
Source: BCG, 2026
Failure pattern: prompt-only forecast failure
Source: Argon & Co IRIS, JD.com SCPA, BCG X, European consumer goods case
Source: First Solar Kinaxis 2013-2014 case study
Failure pattern: contractual-liability-caps
Source: Jones Walker analysis (2025)
Source: McKinsey (2018), Caresoft Global (2026), Star.global/Toyota (2025), arXiv/Ford (2024)
Failure pattern: data fragmentation
Source: FDA Cyclospora outbreak investigation (July 2026)
Failure pattern: inaccurate outputs
Source: Brown & Brown (2025), GAO (2025)
Failure pattern: Lack of graceful degradation
Source: Logistics Viewpoints (Oct 2025)
Failure pattern: insufficient standalone reliability
Source: Windward MIOC, DHS S&T, arXiv 2505.18851
Failure pattern: substitution-overestimation
Source: Rabobank/RaboResearch, IFCHOR Galbraiths, Miller Magazine
Failure pattern: model-concentration-risk
Source: SignalFire 2025 State of Talent Report
Failure pattern: supplier-visibility-gap
Source: Hearn Law Firm Ford Recall Statistics, AMS/ABB Automotive Manufacturing Outlook Survey 2025
Failure pattern: ROI overestimation
Source: VE3 (LogiPharma 2024 AI Report)
